An Analysis of the Monster Concept from Foucault's Perspective in "Las Minenas"

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Visual Arts, University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Postdoctoral Researcher in Philosophy, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Visual Arts, University of Islamic Arts, Tabriz, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.34785/J016.2022.007

Abstract

The core of the monster's emergence, according to Foucault, is a mixture or hybrid that emerges at the junction of nature and law and challenges order. The main purpose of this paper is to study the concept of the monster from Foucault's perspective and to analyze the place of this concept in Foucault's thought. This is done in order to be able to use the concept of the monster in connection with visual representation in art. Our questions in this study are: How did Foucault conceptualize the monster in the various coordinates and dimensions of his thought? Given the fundamental importance of the issue of representation in the Las Minenas painting by Velasquez and Foucault's special attention to this work of art in this regard, what is the relationship between Foucault's monster and visual representation in this work? ? This research has been done with a content analysis approach and analytical-descriptive method and the results show that for Foucault the monster is an autonomous, violent, but ultimately natural form of the abnormal and how Foucault encounters the concept of the monster primarily is associated with decentralization of the normal. In Las Minenas painting, monsters are the ones who distort the order of representation or are basically out of representation.

Keywords

References

 
پاکباز، رویین. (1386). دایرة­المعارف هنر. تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
  جلایی پور، حمیدرضا؛ سعیدی، علی اصغر؛ حبیبی پور گتابی، کرم. (1391). "تحلیل سیاست‏گذاری اجتماعی با لنز حکومت‏مندی". در مطالعات جامعه شناختی (نامه علوم اجتماعی سابق). 19(2): 200-167.  
  سیدمن، استیون. (1386). کشاکش آراء در جامعه­شناسی. ترجمه­ی هادی جلیلی. تهران: نشر نی.
  فوکو، میشل. (1389). نظم اشیاء، دیرینه­شناسی علوم انسانی. ترجمه­ی یحیی امامی. تهران: پژوهشکده­ی مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
  فوکو، میشل. (1388). مراقبت و تنبیه (تولد زندان). ترجمه­ی نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده. نشر نی: تهران.
 کریمی، بیان. (1399). "سوبژکتیویتة بدن­مند اخلاقی: فوکو و لویناس". در مجله­ی پژوهش­های فلسفی. 14 (33): 355- 369.  
 گاردنر، هلن. (1385). هنر در گذر زمان. ترجمه­ی محمدتقی فرامرزی. تهران: نشر آگاه.
  هژبر راجعونی، علی و مهربد، پروانه. (1399). "بررسی ساختار مولکولی ویروس SARS- CoV- 2 و داروهای مرتبط" در مجله­ی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اراک. 23 (5)، 631- 614.
 گرویر، کلی. (دسامبر 2020). بی­بی­سی فارسی: ندیمه­ها؛ رازگشایی شاهکاری از ولاسکز.  
 
 References
Bernstein, Beth Ann. (2021). Exploring Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Sexuality in Four Spanish Plays: A Crisis of Identity. Meryland: Lexington Books.
  Canguilhem, Georges. (1962). “Monstrosity and the Monstrous” in Diogenes, trans. Therese Jaeger. 10 (40): 27–42.
  Elkins, James. (1999). “Why Are Our Pictures Puzzles? On the Modern Origins of Pictorial Complexity”. London: Routledge.
  Foucault, Michel. (2003). “Abnormal”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974‐1975, trans. Graham Burchell, English series ed. Arnold I. Davidson. New York: Picador.
  Foucault, Michel. (2003). “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975‐1976, trans. David Macey, English series ed. Arnold I. Davidson. New York: Picador.
  Melnick, Alexandra. (2017). “Knowledge is Knowing Frankenstein isn’t the Monster, Wisdom is Knowing Frankenstein is the Monster: An Exploration on Mankind and Monstrosity” in Acta Cogitata: Vol. 3, Article 4, 33- 43.
  Nuzzo, Lociano (2013). “Foucault and the Enigma of the Monster” in International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 26 (1): 55-72.
  Půtová, Barbora. (2018). “Freak shows. Otherness of the human body as a form of public presentation” In Anthropologie. 56. 91-102. 10.26720/anthro.17.07.20.1.
  Sharpe, Andrew N. (2007). “Foucault’s Monsters, the Abnormal Individuals and the Challeng of English Law” in Journal of Historical Sociology. 20 (3): 384- 404.  
  Sharpe, Andrew N. (2009). Foucault's Monsters and the Challenge of Law. London: Routledge.
  Stone, Brad E. (2004). “Defending Society from the Abnormal: The Archaeology of Bio- Power” in Foucault Studies. 1: 77- 91. Loyola Marymount University.
  Tanke, Joseph J. (2008). “The Specter of Manet: A Contribution to the Archaeology of Painting” in The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66 (4): 381–392.
  Troshynski, Emily I. and Weiner, Jesse D. (2016). “Freak Show: Modern Constructions of Ciceronian Monstra and Foucauldian Monstrosity” in Law, Culture and the Humanities. 12(3), 741–765.
 
Sociology of Culture and Art
Volume 4, Issue 1 - Serial Number 10
February 2022
Pages 41-23

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics