نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه جامعه شناسی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 استاد گروه جامعه شناسی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه جامعه شناسی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
4 استادیار، گروه فلسفه و مطالعات فرهنگی، دانشگاه سلیمانیه، سلیمانیه، عراق
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The purpose of the present study is to study the historical sociology of international relations in the context of the formation of the social-political currents of Kurdistan of Iran in its historical backwardness using the theory of Uneven and compound development. The main question of the research is that Iranian Kurdistan in the [second] Pahlavi period, despite the weakness of economic, social and cultural indicators, how is it possible to form currents in the socio-political context in a state of historical backwardness? The prevailing view on development in a general sense dictates that a level of economic, political, social and cultural development is necessary for the formation of social political currents. So how is it that in Iranian Kurdistan, despite the state of underdevelopment, we are faced with the formation and multiplicity of currents [and consequently their intersection]? The method used in this study is the method of historical sociology that has been influenced by the sequence of internal terms itself, the idea of Uneven and composite development, Uneven, composition, and development. According to the theoretical discussions and studies on the Kurdistan of Iran in the 60s, 70s Data selection and discussions have been made from the theoretical validity of the extent of the findings to the historical data. The results show that the logic of the formation of socio-political currents in Iranian Kurdistan was formed not by referring to the internal/external changes of the Kurdistan society, but based on its interaction and coexistence with societies that have been in a state of asynchronous synchronicity in terms of the development of Iranian Kurdistan. Therefore, the formation and later meeting of currents in Iranian Kurdistan in this historical situation can be on the one hand caused by the whip of external necessity in an asynchronous situation with the movement of points and the Historical Lag of Kurdistan in a simultaneous situation with the international affairs. The international community knew that this was possible by combining and replacing the international affairs with the internal affairs of Iranian Kurdistan.".
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)