تبیین جامعه شناختی خشونت علیه همسر از دریچه تئوری عمومی جرم (قلمروهای زندگی) اگنیو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه شناسی فرهنگی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

10.22034/scart.2024.140626.1455

چکیده

هدف اصلی این مقاله بررسی چرایی مبادرت افراد به خشونت علیه همسر با استفاده از تئوری عمومی جرم (قلمروهای زندگی) اگنیو است. روش پژوهش توصیفی – همبستگی بود. با استفاده از نمونه 450 نفری از زنان و مردان متأهل مراجعه کننده به دادگاه‌های خانواده، مراکز بهزیستی و کمیته امداد امام خمینی شهر رشت به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب و مفروضه‌های تئوری عمومی جرم مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. مقیاس‌های مورد استفاده در پژوهش شامل خشونت علیه همسر، محدودیت در برابر جرم، انگیزه برای جرم، قلمرو مشکل آفرین فردی، خانوادگی، همالان و شغلی بود. خلاصه ضرایب غیرمستقیم مدل نشان می‌دهد که قلمرو همالان مشکل آفرین (ضریب بتا: 073/0)، قلمرو فردی مشکل آفرین (ضریب بتا: 085/0)، قلمرو خانوادگی مشکل آفرین (ضریب بتا: 101/0) و قلمرو شغلی مشکل آفرین (ضریب بتا: 083/0) با تأثیرگذاری بر محدودیت در برابر جرم و انگیزه برای جرم (به صورت غیرمستقیم بر خشونت علیه همسر تأثیر دارند. چهار قلمرو مشکل آفرین زندگی، انگیزه برای جرم و محدودیت در برابر جرم و همچنین متغیرهای دموگرافیک قادرند 58 درصد از واریانس خشونت علیه همسر را تبیین نمایند. همچنین قلمروهای مشکل آفرین زندگی یعنی قلمروهای خانواد، فردی، همالان و شغلی قادرند 21 درصد از واریانس محدودیت در برابر جرم و 25 درصد از واریانس انگیزه برای جرم را تبیین نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sociological explanation of intimate partner violence through the lens of Agnew's general theory of crime (Life domains).

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedeh masoomeh Shadmanfaat 1
  • Mohammad Mahdi Rahmati 2
  • Hoda Hallajzadeh 3
1 PH. D. Student of Cultural Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Associate professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
3 Assistant professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

The main purpose of this article is to investigate why people resort to violence against their spouses using Agnew's general theory of crime (domains of life). The research method employed was descriptive-correlational. A sample of 450 married men and women, drawn from individuals referring to family courts, welfare centers, and the Imam Khomeini Relief Committee in Rasht city, was investigated using the available sampling method and assumptions based on the general theory of crime. The scales used in the research included violence against spouse, constrains against crime, motivation for crime, personal, family, family, and occupational problem-causing domains The summary of the indirect coefficients of the model shows that the problematic peer domain (beta coefficient: 0.073), the problematic personal domain (beta coefficient: 0.085), the problematic family domain (beta coefficient: 0.101) and the problematic occupational domain (Beta coefficient: 0.083) by affecting the constrains against crime and motivation for crime indirectly affect violence against spouse. The four problematic life domains, motivation for crime and constrains against crime, as well as demographic variables are able to 58 explain the percentage of the variance of violence against the spouse. Also, the problematic domains of life are able to explain 21% of the variance of the constrains against crime and 25% of the variance of the motivation for crime.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • general theory of crime
  • problematic life domains
  • violence
  • against spouse

مراجع

منابع
اسکندری، سمانه؛ علیوردی­ نیا، اکبر؛ ریاحی، محمد اسماعیل؛ معمار، رحمت ­الله (1400). تبیین جامعه‌شناختی نگرش نسبت به خشونت علیه زنان در میان دانشجویان پسر دانشگاه‌های استان مازندران. مطالعات اجتماعی روان شناختی زنان، 19(2)، 119-164.
جعفرزاده، تکتم؛ سلیمانیان، علی ­اکبر؛ محمدی­ پور، محمد (1399). پیش­بینی خشونت خانگی بر اساس عملکرد خانواده و سطح تمایزیافتگی خود با نقش واسطه‌ای ناگویی هیجانی در زنان مراجعه­ کننده به مراکز خدمات جامع سلامت شهر بجنورد. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشنامه تربیتی دانشگاه آزاد واحد بجنورد، 16(65)، 59-78.
حسن­ پور، هیوا؛ هدایتی ­زاده، هاجر (1402). خشونت اکولوژیکی علیه زنان در آثار علی اشرف درویشیان (مطالعۀ موردی: فصل نان، سال‌های ابری، همراه آهنگ‌های بابام، آبشوران). جامعه شناسی فرهنگ و هنر، 5(4)، 107-118.
علیوردی­ نیا، اکبر؛ حبیبی، مرجان (1394). بررسی نگرش دانشجویان پسر نسبت به خشونت علیه زنان در بستر خانواده: آزمون تجربی نظریه یادگیری اجتماعی ایکرز. پژوهش‌های راهبردی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، 4(3)، 15-38.
غفاری شهیر، مژگان؛ اسدپور، اسماعیل؛ زهراکار، کیانوش (1400). مقایسه اثربخشی درمان‌های شناختی‌رفتاری و هیجان‌مدار بر احساس تنهایی در زنان متأهل قربانی خشونت خانگی. تازه‌های علوم شناختی، ۲۳ (۱): ۱۰۵-۹۵
فیروزجاییان، علی­اصغر؛ رضایی چراتی، زهرا (1393). تحلیل جامعه‌شناختی خشونت زنان علیه مردان. توسعه اجتماعی، 9(2)، 105-130.
محمدی، شهرام؛ توفیق فارس، هه­ وار (1402). بنیادگرایی و خشونت علیه زنان (مورد مطالعه: زنان ایزدی). جامعه­ شناسی فرهنگ و هنر، 5(1)، 90-108.
نظری، فاطمه؛ محمودی، معصومه (1399). مقایسه خشونت خانگی در زنان مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز مشاوره و زنان عادی شهر بوشهر. فصلنامه علمی تخصصی دانش انتظامی بوشهر، 11(40)، 51-61.
یاری‌نسب، فاطمه؛ امینی کامروز (1398). میزان و نوع خشونت خانگی در زنان متقاضی طلاق مراجعه‌کننده به سازمان پزشکی قانونی شهرستان بویراحمد. مجله پزشکی قانونی ایران، ۲۵(۴)، ۴۴-۳۹.
 
References
Abajobir, A. A., Kisely, S., Williams, G. M., Clavarino, A. M., & Najman, J. M. (2017). Substantiated childhood maltreatment and intimate partner violence victimization in young adulthood: a birth cohort study. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(1), 165-179.
Abdel-Salam, D. M., ALruwaili, B., Osman, D. M., Alazmi, M. M. M., ALghayyadh, S. A. M., Al-Sharari, R. G. Z., & Mohamed, R. A. (2022). Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among women attending different primary health centers in Aljouf Region, Saudi Arabia. International journal of environmental research public health, 19(1), 598.
Agnew, R. (2005). Why do criminals offend? A general theory of crime and delinquency. Los
Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
Akers, R. L. (1988). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Ayubi, M., & Satyen, L. (2023). Factors associated with intimate partner violence perpetration among migrant men: a systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15248380231178758.
Barton-Crosby, J. L. (2018). Situational Action Theory and intimate partner violence: An exploration of morality as the underlying mechanism in the explanation of violent crime, University of Cambridge.
Castro, E. D., Nobles, M. R., & Zavala, E. (2020). Assessing intimate partner violence in a control balance theory framework. Journal of interpersonal violence, 32(4), 519-533.
Cho, S., & Lacey, B. (2022). The impact of life domains on developmental trajectories of peer delinquency among Korean adolescents: A partial test of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency with a group-based trajectory modeling approach. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 66(13-14), 1387-1414.
Choi, J., & Kruis, N. E. (2019). The Effects of Life Domains on Cyberbullying and Bullying: Testing the Generalizability of Agnew’s Integrated General Theory. Crime and Delinquency, 65(6), 772-800.
Clare, C. A., Velasquez, G., Martorell, G. M. M., Fernandez, D., Dinh, J., & Montague, A. (2021). Risk factors for male perpetration of intimate partner violence: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 56, 101532.
Cochran, J. K. (2017). The effects of life domains, constraints, and motivations on academic dishonesty: A partial test and extension of Agnew’s general theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology, 61(11), 1288-1308.
Cooper, A. N., Seibert, G. S., May, R. W., Fitzgerald, M. C., & Fincham, F. D. (2017). School burnout and intimate partner violence: The role of self-control. Personality and individual differences, 112, 18-25.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933-948.
Gateri, A. M., Ondicho, T. G., & Karimi, E. (2021). Correlates of Domestic Violence against Men: Qualitative insights from Kenya. African Journal of Gender, Society and Development (formerly Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa), 10(3), 87-111.
Giordano, P. C., Copp, J. E., Longmore, M. A., & Manning, W. D. (2016). Anger, control, and intimate partner violence in young adulthood. Journal of family violence, 31, 1-13.
Godfrey, D. A., Kehoe, C. M., Bastardas-Albero, A., & Babcock, J. C. (2020). Empathy mediates the relations between working memory and perpetration of intimate partner violence and aggression. Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 63.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
Hebert, M., Daspe, M. È., Lapierre, A., Godbout, N., Blais, M., Fernet, M., & Lavoie, F. (2019). A meta-analysis of risk and protective factors for dating violence victimization: The role of family and peer interpersonal context. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(4), 574-590.
Jack, S. M., Davidov, D., Stone, C., Ford‐Gilboe, M., Kimber, M., McKee, C., ... & Nurse‐Family Partnership (NFP) Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Research Team. (2023). Factors influencing the implementation of an intimate partner violence intervention in nurse home visiting: A qualitative descriptive study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(4), 1367-1384.
Jungari, S., & Chinchore, S. (2022). Perception, prevalence, and determinants of intimate partner violence during pregnancy in urban slums of Pune, Maharashtra, India. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(1-2), NP239-NP263.
Jungnitz, L., Lenz, H.-J., Puchert, R., Puhe, H., & Walter, W. (2007). Gewalt gegen Männer: Personale Gewaltwiderfahrnisse von Männern in Deutschland. Barbara Budrich.
Kabiri, S., Shadmanfaat, S. M. S., Choi, J., & Yun, I. (2020). The impact of life domains on cyberbullying perpetration in Iran: A partial test of Agnew's general theory of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 1-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101633
Kabiri, S., Shadmanfaat, S. M. S., Choi, J., & Yun, I. (2020). The impact of life domains on cyberbullying perpetration in Iran: a partial test of Agnew's general theory of crime. Journal of criminal justice, 66, 101633.
Kabiri, S., Sharepour, M., Howell, C. J., Wellen, H., Smith, H. P., Cochran, J. K., ... & Andersen, T. S. (2022). Violations of Emergent Norms Regarding COVID-19 Mitigation and Social Hygiene: An Application of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime. Crime & Delinquency, 00111287221130961.
Kabiri, S., Sharepour, M., Howell, C. J., Wellen, H., Smith, H. P., Cochran, J. K., ... & Andersen, T. S. (2022). Violations of Emergent Norms Regarding COVID-19 Mitigation and Social Hygiene: An Application of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime. Crime & Delinquency, 00111287221130961.
Khan, A. R., & Arendse, N. (2022). Female perpetrated domestic violence against men and the case for Bangladesh. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32(4), 519-533.
Kolbe, V., & Büttner, A. (2020). Domestic violence against men—prevalence and risk factors. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 117(31-32), 534.
Korkmaz, S., Överlien, C., & Lagerlöf, H. (2021). Youth intimate partner violence: prevalence, characteristics, associated factors and arenas of violence. Nordic Social Work Research, 4, 1-16.
Kumar, A. (2012). Domestic violence against men in India: A perspective. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 22(3), 290-296.
Lewis, D., Megicks, P., & Jones, P. (2017). Bullying and harassment and work-related stressors: Evidence from British small and medium enterprises. International small business journal, 35(1), 116-137.
Li, C. K. (2022). The applicability of social structure and social learning theory to explain intimate partner violence perpetration across national contexts. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(23-24), NP22475-NP22500.
Mackay, J., Bowen, E., Walker, K., & O'Doherty, L. (2018). Risk factors for female perpetrators of intimate partner violence within criminal justice settings: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 128-146.
Maldonado, A. I., Cunradi, C. B., & Nápoles, A. M. (2020). Racial/ethnic discrimination and intimate partner violence perpetration in latino men: The mediating effects of mental health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(21), 8148.
Malik, J. S., & Nadda, A. (2019). A cross-sectional study of gender-based violence against men in the rural area of Haryana, India. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 44(1), 35.
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of applied psychology, 92(4), 1159.
Moon, M. M., & Jonson, C. L. (2012). The influence of occupational strain on organizational commitment among police: A general strain theory approach. Journal of Criminal justice, 40(3), 249-258.
Munirkazmi, S. S., & Mohyuddin, A. (2012). Violence against men. (A case study of Naiabaadichaakra, Rawalpindi). International Journal of Environment, Ecology, Family and Urban Studies, 2(4), 1-9.
Ngo, F. T., Fisher, T., & Ruiz, R. A. (2022). Life domains, constraints, motivations, and intimate partner violence: Assessing the generality of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 00111287221106951.
Ngo, F. T., Paternoster, R., Cullen, F. T., & Mackenzie, D. L. (2011). Life domains and crime: A test of Agnew's general theory of crime and delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 302-311.
Ngo, F. T., Zavala, E., & Piquero, A. R. (2022). Gender, Life Domains, and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: A Partial Test of Agnew’s General Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 59(4), 487-529.
Ozaki, R., & Otis, M. D. (2017). Gender equality, patriarchal cultural norms, and perpetration of intimate partner violence: Comparison of male university students in Asian and European cultural contexts. Violence against women, 23(9), 1076-1099.
Parade, S. H., Newland, R. P., Bublitz, M. H., & Stroud, L. R. (2019). Maternal witness to intimate partner violence during childhood and prenatal family functioning alter newborn cortisol reactivity. Stress, 22(2), 190-199.
Park, Y., Sullivan, K., Riviere, L. A., Merrill, J. C., & Clarke-Walper, K. (2022). Intimate partner violence perpetration among military spouses. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(15-16), NP13497-NP13517.
Piquero, A. R., & Brezina, T. (2001). Testing Moffitt's account of adolescence‐limited delinquency. Criminology, 39(2), 353-370.
Plouffe, R. A., Wilson, C. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2020). The role of dark personality traits in intimate partner violence: A multi-study investigation. Current Psychology, 1-20.
Rai, A., & Choi, Y. J. (2021). Domestic violence victimization among south Asian immigrant men and women in the United States. Journal of interpersonal violence, 08862605211015262.
Ríos-González, O., Peña Axt, J. C., Duque Sánchez, E., & De Botton Fernández, L. (2018). The language of ethics and double standards in the affective and sexual socialization of youth. Communicative acts in the family environment as protective or risk factors of intimate partner violence. Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 19.
Rivas-Rivero, E., & Bonilla-Algovia, E. (2022). Adverse childhood events and substance misuse in men who perpetrated intimate partner violence. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 66(8), 876-895.
Roh, M., & Marshall, I. (2018). A cross-cultural analysis of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 2(1), 301-321.
Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2020). Myths about intimate partner violence and moral disengagement: An analysis of sociocultural dimensions sustaining violence against women. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(21), 8139.
Rosebraugh, E. (2023). Moral disengagement, empathy, and bidirectional intimate partner violence in young adulthood: A short-term longitudinal study (Doctoral dissertation, Wichita State University).
Sere, Y., Roman, N. V., & Ruiter, R. A. (2021). Coping with the experiences of intimate partner violence among South African women: systematic review and meta-synthesis. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 522.
Sherin, K. M., Sinacore, J. M., Li, X. Q., Zitter, R. E., & Shakil, A. (1998). HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY-, 30, 508-512.
Shorey, R. C., Haynes, E., Brem, M., Florimbio, A. R., Grigorian, H., & Stuart, G. L. (2018). Marijuana use is associated with intimate partner violence perpetration among men arrested for domestic violence. Translational issues in psychological science, 4(1), 108.
Steele, M. E., Sutton, T. E., Brown, A., Simons, L. G., & Warren, P. Y. (2022). A test of General Strain Theory: Explaining intimate partner violence and alcohol use among Black women. Feminist Criminology, 17(2), 163-184.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2019). A simplified approach to measuring national gender inequality. PloS one, 14(1), e0205349.
Stubbs, A., & Szoeke, C. (2021). The effect of intimate partner violence on the physical health and health-related behaviors of women: A systematic review of the literature. Trauma, violence, & abuse, 1524838020985541.
Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25(4), 863-892.
Trombetta, T., & Rolle, L. (2023). Intimate partner violence perpetration among sexual minority people and associated factors: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Sexuality research and social policy, 20(3), 886-935.
Tur-Prats, A. (2019). Family types and intimate partner violence: A historical perspective. Review of Economics and Statistics, 101(5), 878-891.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2004). Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In M. Joan (Ed.), Beyond empiricism: Institutions intentions in the study of crime (First Edition ed., pp. 1-37): Transaction Publishers.
Yaya, S., Hudani, A., Buh, A., & Bishwajit, G. (2021). Prevalence and predictors of intimate partner violence among married women in Egypt. Journal of interpersonal violence, 36(21-22), 10686-10704.
Zafar, S., Zia, S., & Amir-ud-Din, R. (2022). Troubling trade-offs between women’s work and intimate partner violence: evidence from 19 developing countries. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(17-18), NP16180-NP16205.
Zavala, E. (2017). A multi-theoretical framework to explain same-sex intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: A test of social learning, strain, and self-control. Journal of crime and justice, 40(4), 478-496.
Zavala, E., & Melander, L. A. (2019). Intimate partner violence perpetrated by police officers: Is it self-control or the desire-to-be-in-control that matters more? Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 28(2), 166-185.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار